Wednesday, January 11, 2012
The first political moderate ...
It would be wise to eat in moderation, to at least allow some rabbits to survive, so they can continue to reproduce.
When I was growing up, there were those who liked to hunt without restraint ...but there were also Conservation Officers who roamed about, trying to encourage others to obey the rules, to conserve. Most were friendly, and could just as accurately be called Conversation Officers, but whether they were called that or Rangers, ...they were appreciated by some, and disliked by others.
A story within a story ...
The first part of this part of the story, is about a report of rabid wild dogs roaming about the forest. The Ranger warned the residents of the area not to allow their own dogs to be off a leash, to roam about. Some of the residents did not believe there was a visible threat, and they resented being told what to do (even though it was only a recommendation).
That winter there was an unusually large snowfall. The Ranger warned the residents along the river that their homes were in danger. But it was also an unusually cold and long springtime ...allowing much of the snow to stay longer, and melt gradually. Therefore, the riverbank was able to sustain the slow, steady thaw.
God tells us what is wrong, and warns us of dangers ...and I'm thankful for that! I also feel a bit of obligation to tell others. I do this out of love, because I don't wish anyone to slip into an area of their life where the truths of God are minimized; or where God warns us, or encourages us not to be.
Is it like a 'dog fight' between ideologies ...or simply one of pride and prestige?
I've been watching the political debates ...of the Republican candidates. They don't choose the topics to talk about, but much conversation comes about in reference to the 'gay' lifestyle. And the moderators often try to draw out feelings that aren't accurate. or that aren't present at all.
My wife was researching 'pit bulls' on the internet. We know that everything on the internet is not entirely accurate, and some not very accurate ...but it can be interesting, and believe it or not, often accurate at times. She found a description of how the dogs have had a controversial history, and how the dog's breed was often redefined to dismiss the validity of protests against the breed and to give rationale to protect the dog's image. The article said that owners will deny the possibility of anything you may say against their dog ...and will even deny that their dog is a pit bull; stating that their dog is so docile and friendly that it could only possibly lick you to death.
I'm not going to argue that point ....
The point is back to the 'gay' lifestyle argument, which has led to policy changes to the extent that Christian adoption agencies have been forced out of their charitable work of finding homes for homeless children, simply because they are unwilling to support a 'gay' lifestyle home. Now, I ask, is this in the best interest of children, to close down an organization that is doing much for the welfare of children, simply because of their hesitation and discretion on vitally important decisions?
But my main point is, God defines how it should be ...not me.
Though ...I do agree with God. After all, how beneficial is it to not? I state what I state because I believe it, and I believe it is not beneficial for anyone to think of themselves wiser than our Creator, who cares so much for us ...and sent His own Son, to create a chance and a way for us in life.
I agree with those who say intolerance bears itself out more within the confines of those who often attempt to accuse others as being intolerant. Dealing professionally for years with homosexuals, transsexuals, bisexuals, and asexuals to 'z'sexuals ...hardly qualifies me as being homophobic. I have strong views in reference to divorce and abortion also, but for some reason the moderators mainly chose the 'gay' issue. I say, try not to be Veritaphobic ..."fearing the truth". Not to be cruel, or judgmental ...it's just good to have it checked out, your sight and insight ...and try to look through the glass clearly.
The enemy is subtle, like a serpent ...like a fox.
(http://shouldntwethinkthisthrough.blogspot.com) Back to the fox, it's like a fox in sheep's clothing. Many of you think the fox is Fox News; so you listen to all the other networks who are trying to outfox the Fox.
In the Bible, First Kings, Chapter 19, tells of how Elijah feared Jezebel. But he also allowed that fear to help paint a very gloomy picture of how everything was; which brought him to the point of feeling he was isolated from everyone. He said his entire country had turned away from what they were founded upon; had torn down their beliefs and practices; and had labeled all those as dedicated as himself as enemies, and pursued them. Feeling totally isolated, he said, "And I, even I only, am left ..."
Elijah saw great works of God. He saw God reveal His power in front of all those believing in a false god ...and it was revealed in a mighty way. But as Elijah stood now, he was fearing the words of Jezebel ...and he felt he could no longer stand at all. At this very moment God caused a great wind to come, breaking the mountainous rock to pieces ...but God was not in the wind. Then God caused a tremendous earthquake to shake the foundations of the earth ...but God was not in the earthquake. After that, God caused a fire to consume everything in sight ...but God was not in that either. As the smoke, dust, and wind settled ...Elijah stood in the stillness, and heard a small voice.
There are dangers ...and there are also benefits to things we cannot see. I guess it just seems easier to talk about the dangers, though it shouldn't be. But that seems to be how most of us are ...and when discussing something that is invisible, it's difficult to convince someone of the validity of it. Many years ago, it was believed that the sun revolved around the earth, because that is how people saw it. Now, I agree that learning the untruth about that was not nearly as painful as it would be to learn that carbon dioxide is invisible, yet can kill you.
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)